were not wasting paper food

:Dumpster Diving


guide - articles - photos - laws - archive - emo.ware
[eating the food you waste]

supermarkets throw away a disgusting amounts of food on a daily basis. food that could be going to local people who are hungry and homeless. or food that can be taken by people who don't want to fund supermarkets anymore. for them, dumpster diving is more than just free food, it's fun.

"burdens lift and scarcity is averted when the mountains of trash produced by this insane society become supplies and sustenance. everything that sucks about capitalism is inverted when the dumpster diver scores. poverty becomes abundance. loss becomes gain. despair becomes hope." - dumpster diving, recipes for disaster, crimethinc

kid in dumpster with mountain of food. head of broccoli demands, "what are you doing in here?" kid counters, "what are you doing in here?"

[the dumpster divers]

dumpster diving for our food and your enjoyment, we are one pre-student, one student, one post-student and one post-worker living in the centre of the lovely and riotous copenhagen.

please feel free to email us about anything, be it relating to dumpster diving or otherwise, at emoware@gmail.com

[useful pages / articles]   

  • dumptser diving guide
  • issues / debates
  • legal stuff
  • dumpster diving photos
  • diving in the uk
  • diving across europe
  • 10.07.2008: we just returned from the roskilde festival, which should explain our recent lack of posts. and whilst there wasn't much to do in the way of dumpster diving on the festival site, there were plenty of opportunities for preying on other people's waste, which was in great abundance (waste in abundance, something seems wrong about that sentence). as a vegetarian i found it quite difficult, what with the vast majority of food being meat, but i managed.

    it scared me how much nachos people were eating. if only you could survive on leftover chilli peppers.

    our highlight was when, after seeing me ask a guy if he was really about to throw away that broccoli and feta pancake, a couple of female workers gave us meal vouchers. that was pure festival magic. and then when the festival is over, everyone just leaves all their stuff behind. it almost feels like stealing.

    anyway, now we're back and our fridge was approaching a sorry state of emptiness. so:

    • 1kg sugary breakfast cereal
    • 12 bread rolls
    • 18 buns
    • 9 ciabattas
    • 4 loaves
    • 2kg carrots
    • 250g cherry tomatoes
    • 3 onions
    the bad news is that our local, and previously all time favourite dumpster, has disappeared. it looks like they've started storing them inside. this is extremely annoying because we know it's not our fault, we've had no trouble there and never left any traces of our presence. first the food stopped appearing, and now the bins. and it all coincided with a nearby street that until recently was occupied with much fun and festivities. nevermind. there's plenty of other dumpsters.





    20.06.2008: i'm still in a critical mood, so i'll pick on freegan magazine. and i'm totally allowed to, because they're directly taking a whole bunch of my writing (hello there) without asking or telling me. i believe in the creative commons and hate copyright, so i don't actually mind them doing it, yet. because it's not like they can claim non-commercial use with all those adverts pasted across their pages.

    this isn't my criticism, that they're not creating their own content but stealing it instead (isn't it actually quite fitting?). it's this sentence i don't like:

    The Freegan dumpster diving frenzy that is occurring across the United States and other countries is attributed to the higher cost of fuel and food where consumers are looking to save money and the environment.

    which is bullshit. wasn't the point of freeganism (stop me if i'm wrong here) to remove yourself from the evils of a "complex, industrial, mass-production economy driven by profit, abuses of humans, animals, and the earth abound at all levels of production"? not to save money.

    and the higher cost of food? in the pursuit of ever more competitive prices (also ever higher profit margins, don't forget what's actually important), food production has been industrialised to the point of disaster. and, as said above, that is what freeganism is against. there's a reason why 'ethical' food (organic, locally grown and fairly traded) is expensive. it's because that's how much it costs. maybe the problem is that people aren't willing to pay the actual (and fair) cost of food anymore.

    as for attributing it to the higher cost of fuel, and claiming to be trying to save the environment in the same sentence, how does that make any sense? infact, what does the high cost of fuel have to do with anything?

    finally, dumpster diving is not a frenzy occuring across anywhere. worded like that it sounds like a current trend. or a fad. dumspter diving has been happening as long as "supply and demand" has existed, and not since the media got interested and people started giving it stupid names.

    "The best things in life are Freegan". no, the best things in life aren't things at all.

    anyway, i'm going to go back to being nice now. constructive and helpful. hopefully.





    18.06.2008: someone baited me with this horrible piece of writing, which is for the best part nothing but a nasty and simplistic reaction to the mainstream media coverage of dumspter diving (shouldn't you know better?). i was going to ignore it, which is the best way to deal with people who pride themselves on being opinionated and politically incorrect (annoying), but there was something about the slew of unnecessary insults and badly thought out arguements i just couldn't let go. and it's important for two reasons, specifically it shows how easily dumpster diving is misunderstood (she has completely missed the point), and more generally it shows how wrong things go when people forge their opinions based solely on what the media says.

    so, her main point seems to be summed up by the fourth paragraph:

    But you must wonder if the compactors, freecyclers, freegans, frugalists, garbage pickers, and dumpster divers really just hate their own lives, and hate others for being happy, enjoying an increasing standard of living, or building a life of luxury. For certain, they hate the advancements that capitalism brings us, and they hate that consumers have so many choices for making their lives better, and oftentimes at lower costs and using less time.

    there are a number of assumptions being made that need pointing out. the first is that all dumpster divers have a choice regarding their situation, which is clearly not true. the majority of homeless people are not homeless by choice. and when a student is heavily in debt, can you blame them for living off garbage that no one else wants? (or should only the upper class be allowed education?)

    the term "freegan" does imply choice, but her knowledge of freegans seems limited to the unsurprisingly narrowminded media attention they've recieved. this is probably where the second asumption comes from, that freegans are unambitious, lazy, and don't contribute to society. presuming so reduces everyone down to nothing but consumers. many freegans do have jobs, and many also contribute to society in ways that can't be measured by economics, and in ways that benefit the whole of humanity, not just the top 5%. what they definately don't do is hurt the bottom 80%. dumpster divers are not "bums/freeloaders/losers", they're not living off others in a way that deprives anyone of anything (apart from maybe each other, if they get too greedy). they simply live off the waste, the stuff that someone else has decided they don't wont and rather than passing it on to someone in need (as 'food not bombs' does) has attempted to selfishly destroy it. dumpster divers cause no harm, we just take advantage (something all good capitalists should understand). we reduce waste that would otherwise go to landfill and help feed a few hungry mouths. so why the spiteful comments? where is her hate coming from?

    well she's clearly annoyed about the words that we apparently call ourselves, and here me and her might be able to agree - i hate these words too. there's nothing worse than a loaded word (such as freegan or frugal) being blanket applied to a large and diverse group of people, especially if it leads to all of the above assumptions. but who was it exactly that called us frugal? or even freegan for that matter? was it one of us using the "propagandist we"? or was it the mindless media, attracted to catchy names and over simplified concepts, like flies to shit? and anyway freecycling is just a scaled up gift economics. don't be so fucking uptight and selfish.

    apparently i hate other people's "happiness". unlike the wrath the dumpster divers seem to have incurred, the only hate i have is for those who intentionally or knowingly cause harm. why do we have to hate each other? is there not room enough for all our worlds to coexist? the "advancements" that capitalism has brought us include a grotesque wealth disparity (national and international), sweatshop labour, to the brink of environmental disaster, the destruction of public space and a marketing machine so strong it permeates our lives completely. it leaves very little room for much all else. so no, i guess we can't coexist.

    sure, if you win the international birth lottery (congratulations, but don't try and tell me you're affluence comes from hard work) you can live a life of luxury, even an ethical one if you're rich enough, but it's still at the expense of other people. and unfortunately, for her argument at least, we can't all have elitist jobs such as "physicists, accountants, lawyers, doctors, mechanics, insurance agents" (i think we'd be better doing away with at least three of those anyway). where would your life of luxury be without the factory workers and the service industry toiling away beneath you (yes, like slaves) for little reward.

    another one of my favourite paragraphs:

    These free-wandering types strike the average person as being losers who don't want to work a job and who can't make it in the world of hard work and achievement. So they conjure up every excuse to "live the simpleton life," exclaiming that it "makes them happy" to be nothing, have nothing, and strive for nothing.

    whilst speaking for the "average person". smooth. so am i right to conclude from this that all human progress and endeavour leads to materialism? how does she dare claim to know what can and can't make other people happy? and it doesn't take looking at many surveys to show that all our fantastic progress hasn't actually made us any happier.

    Of course, foraging for food involves two things worth pointing out: trespassing on private property uninvited, and opportunity cost. The opportunity cost is that it takes a lot of time to bypass the efficiencies and conveniences of capitalism, and revert to barbarian ways.

    as mentioned above, capitalism is only convenient for the top few perecent of the population, those who live a "life of luxury" (and were most likely born into it), whilst everyone else in the world struggles and scrapes. as for being barbaric, i think you'll find it is capitalism that is "brutal, cruel, warlike [and] insensitive". no one ever started a war because they didn't want something.

    as for trespassing, dumpster diving (especially this aspect of it) is legal in nearly all countries. but let's not get started on the flimsy concept of 'private property', which is for a completely different and much angrier discussion.

    the 'article' falls completely to pieces by the end, ranting on about the "abundances of the marketplace are not a reason to condemn the human race and reduce yourself to living like a pauper", which makes no sense at all. it's those abundances (and unavoidable failings of supply and demand economics) that creates so much waste and enable us to live like we do. she finishes with a bitter as anything:

    Just don't expect that I won't notice - and criticize - their hatred for humans, progress, and our civilized way of life.

    i wonder if she also hates zero-carbon footprint people for not embracing cheap flights? or vegans for boycotting animal cruelty? human progress is taking our world apart. and i wont apologise for sounding like an anarcho-primitivist when it's the world, and hence the whole of humanity, that is at stake. your "civilized way of life" is destroying forests, poisoning and emptying the sea, polluting the air and, thanks to globalization, oppressing your fellow humans. it also seems to be making you quite hateful. there is nothing civilized about you at all.





    17.06.2008: it has been a while since we went out, due to visitors and a general lack of morale. we were going to cycle all the way down to a large supermarket but by the time it was dark enough we were too tired to bother. so just the locals then:

    • 9 organic bread rolls (65g each)
    • 8 ciabatta buns
    • 6 buns
    • 3 herby halfbaked baguettes
    • 2 durum breads
    • 1 pumpkin bread
    • 4 danish swirls
    • 2 pecan danish
    • 10 bite size brownies (200g)
    • 240g chocolate slices
    • 32 bananas
    • 1 cucumber
    • 750g green peas
    • 75g pine nuts
    • 2 cloths for cleaning glass
    "if you're going to write a story, not just a list, write that one of the dumpster had a pungent smell"





    12.06.2008: from elsewhere:

    ...i also pulled two grapefruit from the dumpster on my way out of the store, whilst the guy who'd just thrown them out had his back turned sweeping the floor. what i couldn't grab without making a noise, in broad daylight with plenty of people around, was a load of tomatoes, salad, mushrooms, bananas and more grapefruit. dumpster diving in this town would be all too easy. but then, walking around with our packs, sleeping bags, etc (ungdomshuset tshirt and "still not loving police") we do rather stand out. really, we're rather passe. i'm not sure why so many people stare at us so intently. now the train arrives and julie comes running back from the shop, clutching three oranges and you know exactly where she got them from.


    ...after breakfast we drove in hirtshals to buy lunch and order dinner. i wandered around inspecting the various dumpsters. all the major supermarkets were collected conveniently near to each other. the fakta actually bothered to lock their dumpster, but the padlocks were so rusted by the sea air you could probably break them with a pair of childrens safety scissors. it was full of milk, and the kids in the car opposite were very interested in what i was doing. the huge superbrugsen dumpster had no locks and contained some fruit and veg, but it was midday and some old woman was staring at me from her balcony above. we let it be.





    10.06.2008: we must look a bit sussed, walking around at 1am in shorts and tshirt but wearing gloves. at least we're not dressed all in black. well, not all the time.

    six stores and all we get is:

    • 500g tricolore pasta
    • 1.8kg chopped cabbage
    • 2 sandwich loaves
    • 3 loaves
    • 45 buns
    • tin of tuna
    • 2 litre of milk
    • bag of carrots
    • bag of fried onion stuff
    actually it's a great amount of bread, and our freezer is now totally full. but we're seriously lacking a (dare i say it) 'sustainable' quantity of fruit and veg. it's time to get the bicycles out.





    09.06.2008: here is a cautionary tale for the english dumpsters divers (and welsh too, i suppose), regarding the Theft Act of 1968 and the depressingly hypocritical Waste Recycling Group, contracted by Wrexham Council who claim to be "committed to dealing with waste in the most economical and environmentally sustainable way - setting an aspirational target to divert 40% of municipal waste away from landfill". if that's true, why were police called when Genny Bove, 46, refused to return four plastic garden chairs to the general waste skip (garbage destined for landfill) where she'd found them? and why, after the council have decided to not press charges (there are signs around the centre threatening civil action under the Environmental Protection Act for people removing items, surely a joke?), have the police filed for prosecution under Section 1 of the the 1968 Theft Act?

    the first question is easy to answer, bureaucracy and narrowmindedness (apparently "rooting through skips ... is clearly very dangerous and not allowed under any circumstances"), reinforcing the fact that the system is broken and matters need to be taken into your own hands. the second question is also easy, and can be answered with more than just "police are scum". firstly, the incident was reported as theft, and as such it's up to the police to prosecute or not (could the council possibly retract their claim of theft? or are they happy sitting back and acting like they've done the right thing by choosing not to press charges?). also, police work on some sort of (ridiculous) points system, where arresting and prosecuting a dumpster diver for theft is worth just as much as apprehending a murderer. just keep telling yourself the system works, i dare you.

    genny wrote to me the following:

    First, the police tried to 'sort it out nice and quickly' by getting me to accept a caution which I refused. Following that, they arrested, photographed, DNA'd, fingerprinted and interviewed me (no comment no comment) under caution on tape; have bailed me three times so far while they proceed with their 'investigation'; threatened to get a search warrant because - and with admirably straight faces - 'we need to recover the stolen goods and return them to their rightful owner' (so they can go back to the landfill skip presumably); tried to set up a video identity parade.

    I'm on bail, reporting back on Friday so that the sergeant from a police station 5 miles away can come to Wrexham, and make me read out on tape or write on proper police forms, the signed statement I sent to the police a couple of weeks back. I decided to make a statement to the police saying I'd taken the chairs from the skip, thinking that this would save them the trouble of doing an identity parade, but a signed statement isn't good enough for the police, it was apparently impossible for an officer in Wrexham police station to take a statement, the local police station dealing with the case doesn't have tape facilities, hence the sergeant being required to come all the way to Wrexham to do the honours.

    that's what you pay taxes for. you can read about her 'adventures' on indymedia (update) and the bbc (also various other places, email me if you want the list).

    you have to admire her stance, and her conviction that she's done no wrong. respect for fighting the good fight. i personally would have legged it long before the police got involved, leaving the chairs if necessary. and failing that i'd have accepted the caution and had done with. actually, fuck that - "A simple caution is not a criminal conviction, but it will be recorded on the police database. It may be used in court as evidence of bad character, or as part of an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) application. The record will remain on the police database along with photographs, fingerprints and any other evidence taken". what a nightmare.

    i'll post again when i get an update on the case.





    29.05.2008: to prove that where there is will, there is always free food:

    • 28 bananas
    • 3 herby baguettes
    • 2 litres milk
    • 5 cartons of apple juice
    • rocket
    • 3 cauliflowers
    • 1 lettuce
    • 250g cheese slices (diet cheese, not cheese at all - but shiny!)
    • 10 onions
    • 8 leeks
    • 500g mince meat
    • 400g marinated pig arse
    • 3 lemons
    • 400g chocolate spread
    • instant coffee
    • 8 peppers (7 red, 1 green)
    • 2 cucumbers
    • 5 apples
    • 1kg strawberry yoghurt
    • 1 rye bread
    • 11 carrots
    • 5kg potatoes (most having seen better days)
    • sandwich bags
    • 20 litres of soil
    • 2 dish clothes
    that was two hours of diving time, plus a whole lot of planning (hi-tech stuff, like studying satellite photos, but not extending as far as comparing architectural blueprints). we visited six stores, but due to shortfalls in our contortionist department (also a lack of lube) we only managed to access five sets of dumpsters. two of which were completely devoid of food, whilst another two were seriously lacking. the last dumpster, the one with the most food, was mostly just skanky. it's a store you'd think twice of eating from, even if you took the food straight from the shelf. but tonight we are in no position to be picky.

    there was a lot we threw back too. there was half a litre of sunflower oil but it had already been opened. same with the hot chocolate powder and the cereal. there were also some tomatoes and plums that weren't rescueable (if that's a word). and you may have noticed the meat. this is emil's new experiment. and i find it hard to disagree with (incidentally, i was surprised when i heard of vegans who don't take dairy from the trash, because i've met very few vegans who are so for dietary reasons. my bad?). he's being very selective about the meat he takes, sensible and all that. and really, we do find a lot of meat that's only just gone out of date and looks good. it smelt real good too, those marinated steaks. but no, it's not for me.

    the strangest thing happened too. whilst we were rummaging through our most promising dumpster of the night a car pulled up, blocking our exit. at first i thought it was just turning around, but then lights went out and the engine stopped. it was a man and a woman, just out of view, and they started talking for a while. i had no idea what they were saying or doing, so i suggested we go and hide (in retrospect this would have been terrible). but then emil continues going through the dumpster again, deciding to ignore them. fair enough, because the woman reciprocated and walked straight past us, going through the gate behind which i would have hidden. but then the man comes up right behind me, i can feel him pushing me trying to get a look into the bin. that's when it all went a bit weird and we decided to leave. there was something odd about his eyes, and the way he moved his head. like he was stoned or something. he asked how much moneys worth of food we find, 500kr? we told him way less. then left as fast as was politely possible. it was a shame too, because some of the bin bags in the dumpster were heavy.





    27.05.2008: i think what we're dealing with here is a minor crisis. something strange has happened, and the result is that we're not getting any food. the dumpsters are there all the same, like they always are, but now they're only half full. the same trash is there, all those plastic bags and junk from the staff canteen, but the food is missing. all of it.

    we've come up with a few potential scenarios. for instance, perhaps someone has successfully negotiated with the supermarkets (our two locals at least) to take away their waste food for use in a people's kitchen. i'm pretty sure this would require a law change, and the supermarkets would sooner give their food for pig swill (supporting their own interests, etc) than to hungry people. also, we'd be finding all the food that's actually become inedible. there's normally plenty of it, but not anymore.

    there's always the chance that the supermarkets have stopped being so wasteful. perhaps they have learnt proper stock control. if this were the case then there would be no complaints from our corner, so it's probably not the case (like my logic? it's impeccable).

    further scenarios get into darker territory, what if we've been rumbled? what if they've decided to finally crack down on us, not by locking the bins (the padlocks are there, but unlocked, wouldn't we just get around them if they were used?), but by hoarding the food until the garbage trucks arrive. this is us getting paranoid, but it's the only reasonable explanation we're yet to come up with.

    last night all we got was a litre of peach melba yoghurt and two apples. we picked up a couple of kilos of overly sprouting potatoes, which we're going to plant not eat. there was a bag with foodstuffs in, but it had been filled with yoghurt. it wont do.

    so what's the plan? we've been checking the dumpsters every night, just incase they're getting lazy about throwing stuff out. just incase it's a weird anomaly and it suddenly goes back to business as usual. failing that, we need to start going further afield, investigate other stores, etc. get on our bikes. that's all there is for it. hopefully this isn't new store policy or a city wide phenomena.





    25.05.2008: it seems like we've been going out every night. and it feels like we've not really been getting anywhere. over the last few days we've been greeted by empty dumpster after empty dumpster, and what we have found we've really had to rip and dig for. the tally looks something like this:

    • 15 bananas
    • 2 melons
    • 2 lemons
    • 2 kiwis
    • 2 oranges
    • grapes
    • 5 tomatoes
    • 6 carrots
    • 3 broccolis
    • a thyme plant
    • 2 long rye breads
    • 2 bunches of roses (tasty!
    • roll of cling film (plastic wrap, whatever)
    • 50 disposable cleaning napkins (very disposable, apparently)
    i was especially happy with the plastic wrap, that stuff is indispensable when you have to remove a lot of your produce from its packaging. having said that, most stuff is perfectly fine without its packaging. but for cheese and chopped salad stuffs, just brilliant.

    here's some colour, to brighten up the otherwise dull post:



    firstly we have some kind of omlette made with dumpstered eggs, tomatoes, potatoes and cheese (a little too much cheese looking at the photo, but it sure was tasty). then our dumpstered oatmeal and banana cookies (including honey from the trash too). third comes our almighty sunday roast that fed five people (not inluding what was eaten as leftovers the next day). the meal used carrots, broccoli, green beans, parsnips, potatoes, artichokes, flour, eggs, bread and leeks, all from the trash (we'd bought mushroom sauce, almonds, celery and peas - not a bad ratio). lastly and leastly, fruit cocktails using the pineapple and melon we'd found. the campari came courtesy of the mexican embassy, in a strange and round about way. please don't think we're that posh. the stuff is vile.





    23.05.2008: one of our ongoing projects (meaning: one that hasn't gotten anywhere) has been to develop some kind of dumpster logo. something akin to these:



    the idea is to create a method of communication between fellow dumspter divers, to create a lifesize map, thrown over the 'real' city, marking out the mounds of trash that lay hidden down alleys and behind high fences, to plot the hidden dumpster landscape. some wordy crap like that.

    then the other week i discovered that a dude called posterchild has already created one (great blog, btw). it's gorgeous too, but aesthetics aside, it has a few funadmental flaws. i feel really bad critising the work, but i think it's important that we analyse the implications of using such a stencil and weigh these up against its potential benefits.

    the intention is that the symbol alerts other divers to a good dumpster, and it even has variations to describe the different types of loot you can expect to find inside (food, work materials, etc), which is genius. however, and this is my main concern, it is more likely to alert the owner of the dumpster, in a way far beyond simply leaving a mess - it explicitly says "we raid your trash". chances are they wont be happy and they'll take measures against us. technically it also breaks one of the basic rules of dumspter diving, that you should clean up after yourself and leave no trace you were ever there.

    the other thing is that i can't conceive of other divers actually seeing the symbol unless they were already heading for the dumpster, flashlight in hand and bags at the ready.

    so what do we suggest? firstly, the symbol needs to less obvious (but still universally interpretable) and much simpler, simple enough for anyone to draw or spray in a matter of seconds. secondly, it needs to be away from the dumpster and be directional - a symbol (or series of symbols) that can be seen from a main road and followed. just like a treasure hunt, except with real treausre.





    20.05.2008: finally something to write home about:

    • 2 tubs of yoghurt
    • 4 eggs
    • 1 litre milk
    • 500g cheese (gouda)
    • 16 bread rolls
    • 9 ciabatta rolls
    • 1 really nice loaf
    • 9 red onions
    • celery
    • 4 bunches of spring onions
    • 2 pears
    • icing sugar
    • panty liners
    the milk leaked everywhere, which is annoying because i'd stupidly put it into a paper bag. the cheese was slightly mouldy, but that was easily fixed. the celery is a little limp, but it'll be fine for soups etc. there was so many onions, we took 2kg and ended up with 9 after taking out any that were a little bad.

    we struggled though, sifting through so much garbage. it's not normally this difficult. we honestly didn't think we'd managed to get much until we got home, cleaned it up and wrote it down.

    we're spoilt, we know.





    emo ware
    dumster diving
    63634976  5983723