25.09.2008 :
just so you know, we still haven't run out of bread. our freezer is going strong.
if we're lucky it may even last out the month.
but we can't survive on bread. a few nights ago a couple of us went out to see how our local scene is progressing.
word on the street is "badly". the nearest dumpsters haven't returned and the rest of the pickings were slim.
all we found was a half full can of hairspray. and that's not edible.
we need to make good on our promise of biking out to fresh pastures. soon.
as for non-food, we've been doing as well as ever. we've replaced numerous TVs, replenished kitchen utensils
(all as good as new), pots enough, some great books, and i even found an enlarger, only it was missing a lens
so i took it back.
05.09.2008 :
been too busy having fun to update, sorry. but we've only be rocking some rather fantastic bread anyway.
only ? check this out:
dumpster bread
more bread than emil (wait, i know that sentence doens't make sense).
that's the "dumpster diver's dozen" we picked up last night. a 4am bread run (don't go later than this, bakeries
open horribly early). we got lucky though, we almost couldn't get in. the bakery's beefed up the locks on the doors
to the courtyard where their dumpster is, we really had to push it hard. they'd painted it too.
but seriously, if they want to keep people out (and this is completely understandable) they shouldn't throw
away quite so much bread. just look at it. every night there's that much bread. and it's the third of such
runs we've done recently. a couple of weeks back i cycled home with a two bin bags strapped to my bike, one on the
front and one on the back. and it's fantastic bread too.
we took almost $200 worth last time (well, that's not what it's worth , just how much it would cost).
i might have to resort to eating bread sandwiches. y'know, a sandwich with bread in it.
and everywhere i look i'm covered all in flour.
we we're a little too noisy though. when we discovered the new security we tried to enter through the side door.
someone must have seen us because about half a minute later a guy came around the corner and started looking up and
down the street. i was on look out duty and did a great job of looking unsuspicious and innocuous. it's easy though when
the dude's clearly looking for a punk. he didn't even register me. it's a good job emil didn't come out at that moment with
those two huge bin bags.
but hey, we're pros . we always make our getaway.
11.08.2008 :
i'm finally back in copenhagen, and back to a fridge and freezer both full of great bread.
it's a wonderful thing to come home to.
unfortunately (and actually, it really is a shame), you can't live off bread.
so we went out diving to see if any of our locals have improved. unfortunately not.
we found:
loaf of bread
15 buns
18 eggs
6 litres of orange juice
flodeboller (you don't want to know)
our nearest (and previously best) supermarket is still keeping their bins inside.
aldi is still awful (shouldn't complain, we got eggs and juice), and the dogn netto dumpsters stank .
rancid mucus. the irma bins were completely empty.
we found our fun elsewhere.
30.07.2008 :
i'm currently on the move, so to fill the void i thought i'd post a couple of videos
i've been sitting on for a while, all worth watching.
this first is a sixish minute documentary from travis sheilds,
meet the freegans .
then there's a slightly longer documentary called
skipping meals ,
which gets bonus points for not using the word 'freegan'.
and finally there was short piece on the telegraph website
dumpster
diving with the freegans .
what i like about these videos is they all feature reasonably normal people. normal enough.
maybe the word i'm looking for is respectable? the divers don't come across like obsessive idiots,
which is how a lot of us in the north american press have been portrayed (it's not the interviewees fault).
the dumpster divers in the above films are not being shown as freaks for the masses to laugh at,
they're smart and generally well spoken.
what i'm not so keen on is the naming of specific supermarkets.
they wont like it, and they'll react. and not by wasting less food, they'll just make it harder for us to take it.
but then i'm sure the telegraph doesn't care about that.
10.07.2008 :
we just returned from the roskilde festival, which should explain our recent lack of posts.
and whilst there wasn't much to do in the way of dumpster diving on the festival site, there were plenty of
opportunities for preying on other people's waste, which was in great abundance (waste in abundance,
something seems wrong about that sentence). as a vegetarian i found it quite difficult, what with the
vast majority of food being meat, but i managed.
it scared me how much nachos people were eating. if only you could survive on leftover chilli peppers.
our highlight was when, after seeing me ask a guy if he was really about to throw away that
broccoli and feta pancake, a couple of female workers gave us meal vouchers. that was pure festival magic.
and then when the festival is over, everyone just leaves all their stuff behind. it almost feels like
stealing.
anyway, now we're back and our fridge was approaching a sorry state of emptiness. so:
1kg sugary breakfast cereal
12 bread rolls
18 buns
9 ciabattas
4 loaves
2kg carrots
250g cherry tomatoes
3 onions
the bad news is that our local, and previously all time favourite dumpster, has disappeared.
it looks like they've started storing them inside . this is extremely annoying because we
know it's not our fault, we've had no trouble there and never left any traces of our presence.
first the food stopped appearing, and now the bins. and it all coincided with a nearby street
that until recently was occupied with much fun and festivities. nevermind. there's plenty of
other dumpsters.
20.06.2008 :
i'm still in a critical mood, so i'll pick on freegan
magazine . and i'm totally allowed to, because they're directly taking
a
whole bunch of my writing (hello there) without asking or telling me. i believe in the creative commons and hate copyright,
so i don't actually mind them doing it, yet . because it's not like they can claim
non-commercial use with all those adverts pasted across their pages.
this isn't my criticism, that they're not creating their own content but stealing it instead (isn't it actually quite fitting?).
it's this sentence i don't like:
The Freegan dumpster diving frenzy that is occurring across the United States and other countries is
attributed to the higher cost of fuel and food where consumers are looking to save money and the environment.
which is bullshit. wasn't the point of freeganism (stop me if i'm wrong here) to remove yourself from
the evils of a "complex, industrial, mass-production economy driven by profit, abuses of humans, animals, and the earth abound
at all levels of production"? not to save money.
and the higher cost of food? in the pursuit of ever more competitive prices (also ever higher profit margins,
don't forget what's actually important), food production has been industrialised to the point of disaster.
and, as said above, that is what freeganism is against. there's a reason why 'ethical' food
(organic, locally grown and fairly traded) is expensive. it's because that's how much it costs .
maybe the problem is that people aren't willing to pay the actual (and fair) cost of food anymore.
as for attributing it to the higher cost of fuel, and claiming to be trying to save the environment in the same sentence,
how does that make any sense? infact, what does the high cost of fuel have to do with anything?
finally, dumpster diving is not a frenzy occuring across anywhere. worded like that it sounds like a current trend.
or a fad. dumspter diving has been happening as long as "supply and demand" has existed,
and not since the media got interested and people started giving it stupid names.
"The best things in life are Freegan". no, the best things in life aren't things at all.
anyway, i'm going to go back to being nice now. constructive and helpful. hopefully.
18.06.2008 :
someone baited me with this horrible
piece of writing , which is for the best part nothing but a nasty and simplistic reaction to the mainstream
media coverage of dumspter diving (shouldn't you know better?).
i was going to ignore it, which is the best way to deal with people who pride themselves on being opinionated
and politically incorrect (annoying), but there was something about the slew of unnecessary insults and badly thought out arguements
i just couldn't let go. and it's important for two reasons, specifically it shows how easily dumpster diving is misunderstood
(she has completely missed the point), and more generally it shows how wrong things go when people forge their opinions
based solely on what the media says.
so, her main point seems to be summed up by the fourth paragraph:
But you must wonder if the compactors, freecyclers, freegans, frugalists, garbage pickers,
and dumpster divers really just hate their own lives, and hate others for being happy,
enjoying an increasing standard of living, or building a life of luxury.
For certain, they hate the advancements that capitalism brings us,
and they hate that consumers have so many choices for making their lives better,
and oftentimes at lower costs and using less time.
there are a number of assumptions being made that need pointing out.
the first is that all dumpster divers have a choice regarding their situation, which is
clearly not true. the majority of homeless people are not homeless by choice . and when a student is heavily in debt,
can you blame them for living off garbage that no one else wants? (or should only the upper class be allowed education?)
the term "freegan" does imply choice, but her knowledge of freegans seems limited to the
unsurprisingly narrowminded media attention they've recieved.
this is probably where the second asumption comes from, that freegans are unambitious, lazy, and don't
contribute to society. presuming so reduces everyone down to nothing but consumers.
many freegans do have jobs, and many also contribute to society in ways that can't be measured by
economics, and in ways that benefit the whole of humanity, not just the top 5%.
what they definately don't do is hurt the bottom 80%. dumpster divers are not "bums/freeloaders/losers",
they're not living off others in a way that deprives anyone of anything (apart from maybe each other, if they
get too greedy). they simply live off the waste, the stuff that someone else has decided they don't wont
and rather than passing it on to someone in need (as 'food not bombs' does) has attempted to selfishly destroy it.
dumpster divers cause no harm, we just take advantage (something all good capitalists should understand).
we reduce waste that would otherwise go to landfill and help feed a few hungry mouths.
so why the spiteful comments? where is her hate coming from?
well she's clearly annoyed about the words that we
apparently call ourselves ,
and here me and her might be able to agree - i hate these words too. there's nothing worse than a loaded word
(such as freegan or frugal) being blanket applied to a large and diverse group of people,
especially if it leads to all of the above assumptions.
but who was it exactly that called us frugal? or even freegan for
that matter? was it one of us using the "propagandist we"? or was it the
mindless media, attracted to catchy names and over simplified concepts, like flies to shit?
and anyway freecycling is just a scaled up gift economics. don't be so fucking uptight and selfish.
apparently i hate other people's "happiness". unlike the wrath the dumpster divers seem to have incurred,
the only hate i have is for those who intentionally or knowingly cause harm. why do we have to hate each other?
is there not room enough for all our worlds to coexist?
the "advancements" that capitalism has brought us include a grotesque wealth disparity (national
and international), sweatshop labour, to the brink of environmental disaster, the destruction of public space
and a marketing machine so strong it permeates our lives completely. it leaves very little room for much all else.
so no, i guess we can't coexist.
sure, if you win the international birth lottery (congratulations, but don't try and tell me you're affluence comes from hard work)
you can live a life of luxury, even an ethical one if you're rich enough,
but it's still at the expense of other people.
and unfortunately, for her argument at least, we can't all have elitist jobs such as
"physicists, accountants, lawyers, doctors, mechanics, insurance agents"
(i think we'd be better doing away with at least three of those anyway).
where would your life of luxury be without the factory workers and the service industry
toiling away beneath you (yes, like slaves) for little reward.
another one of my favourite paragraphs:
These free-wandering types strike the average person as being losers who don't want to
work a job and who can't make it in the world of hard work and achievement.
So they conjure up every excuse to "live the simpleton life," exclaiming that it "makes them happy"
to be nothing, have nothing, and strive for nothing.
whilst speaking for the "average person". smooth . so am i right to conclude from this that all human progress
and endeavour leads to materialism ? how does she dare claim to know what can and can't make other people happy?
and it doesn't take looking at many surveys to show that all our fantastic progress hasn't actually made us any happier.
Of course, foraging for food involves two things worth pointing out:
trespassing on private property uninvited, and opportunity cost.
The opportunity cost is that it takes a lot of time to bypass the
efficiencies and conveniences of capitalism, and revert to barbarian ways.
as mentioned above, capitalism is only convenient for the top few perecent of the population,
those who live a "life of luxury" (and were most likely born into it), whilst everyone else
in the world struggles and scrapes. as for being barbaric, i think you'll find it is
capitalism that is "brutal, cruel, warlike [and] insensitive". no one ever started a war
because they didn't want something.
as for trespassing, dumpster diving (especially this aspect of it) is legal in nearly all countries.
but let's not get started on the flimsy concept of 'private property', which is for a completely different
and much angrier discussion.
the 'article' falls completely to pieces by the end, ranting on about the
"abundances of the marketplace are not a reason to condemn the human race and reduce yourself to living like a pauper",
which makes no sense at all. it's those abundances (and unavoidable failings of supply and demand economics) that creates so much
waste and enable us to live like we do. she finishes with a bitter as anything:
Just don't expect that I won't notice - and criticize - their hatred for humans, progress, and our civilized way of life.
i wonder if she also hates zero-carbon footprint people for not embracing cheap flights?
or vegans for boycotting animal cruelty? human progress is taking our world apart.
and i wont apologise for sounding like an anarcho-primitivist
when it's the world, and hence the whole of humanity, that is at stake.
your "civilized way of life" is destroying forests, poisoning and emptying the sea, polluting the air
and, thanks to globalization, oppressing your fellow humans. it also seems to be making you quite hateful.
there is nothing civilized about you at all.
17.06.2008 :
it has been a while since we went out, due to visitors and a general lack of morale.
we were going to cycle all the way down to a large supermarket but by the time it was
dark enough we were too tired to bother. so just the locals then:
9 organic bread rolls (65g each)
8 ciabatta buns
6 buns
3 herby halfbaked baguettes
2 durum breads
1 pumpkin bread
4 danish swirls
2 pecan danish
10 bite size brownies (200g)
240g chocolate slices
32 bananas
1 cucumber
750g green peas
75g pine nuts
2 cloths for cleaning glass
"if you're going to write a story, not just a list, write that one of the dumpster had a pungent smell"
12.06.2008 :
from elsewhere :
...i also pulled two grapefruit from the dumpster on my way out of the store, whilst the guy who'd just thrown them
out had his back turned sweeping the floor. what i couldn't grab without making a noise, in broad daylight with
plenty of people around, was a load of tomatoes, salad, mushrooms, bananas and more grapefruit. dumpster diving in
this town would be all too easy.
but then, walking around with our packs, sleeping bags, etc (ungdomshuset tshirt and "still not loving police")
we do rather stand out. really, we're rather passe. i'm not sure why so many people stare at us so intently.
now the train arrives and julie comes running back from the shop, clutching three oranges and you know exactly
where she got them from.
...after breakfast we drove in hirtshals to buy lunch and order dinner. i wandered around inspecting the various
dumpsters. all the major supermarkets were collected conveniently near to each other. the fakta actually bothered
to lock their dumpster, but the padlocks were so rusted by the sea air you could probably break them with a pair
of childrens safety scissors. it was full of milk, and the kids in the car opposite were very interested
in what i was doing. the huge superbrugsen dumpster had no locks and contained some fruit and veg, but it was midday
and some old woman was staring at me from her balcony above. we let it be.
10.06.2008 :
we must look a bit sussed, walking around at 1am in shorts and tshirt but wearing gloves .
at least we're not dressed all in black. well, not all the time.
six stores and all we get is:
500g tricolore pasta
1.8kg chopped cabbage
2 sandwich loaves
3 loaves
45 buns
tin of tuna
2 litre of milk
bag of carrots
bag of fried onion stuff
actually it's a great amount of bread, and our freezer is now totally full. but we're seriously lacking
a (dare i say it) 'sustainable' quantity of fruit and veg. it's time to get the bicycles out.
09.06.2008 :
here is a cautionary tale for the english dumpsters divers (and welsh too, i suppose), regarding
the Theft Act of 1968 and the depressingly hypocritical Waste Recycling Group, contracted by Wrexham Council
who claim to be "committed to dealing with waste in the most economical and environmentally sustainable way -
setting an aspirational target to divert 40% of municipal waste away from landfill". if that's true, why were police
called when Genny Bove, 46, refused to return four plastic garden chairs to the general waste skip (garbage destined for landfill)
where she'd found them? and why, after the council have decided to not press charges
(there are signs around the centre threatening civil action under the Environmental Protection Act for
people removing items, surely a joke?), have the police filed for prosecution under Section 1 of the the 1968 Theft Act?
the first question is easy to answer, bureaucracy and narrowmindedness (apparently "rooting through skips ... is
clearly very dangerous and not allowed under any circumstances"), reinforcing the fact that the system is broken and
matters need to be taken into your own hands. the second question is also easy, and can be answered with more than
just "police are scum". firstly, the incident was reported as theft, and as such it's up to the police
to prosecute or not (could the council possibly retract their claim of theft? or are they happy sitting back and acting like they've done
the right thing by choosing not to press charges?). also, police work on some sort of (ridiculous)
points system , where arresting and prosecuting a dumpster diver
for theft is worth just as much as apprehending a murderer. just keep telling yourself the system works, i dare you.
genny wrote to me the following:
First, the police tried to 'sort it out nice and quickly' by getting me to accept a caution which I refused.
Following that, they arrested, photographed, DNA'd, fingerprinted and interviewed me (no comment no comment)
under caution on tape; have bailed me three times so far while they proceed with their 'investigation';
threatened to get a search warrant because - and with admirably straight faces - 'we need to recover the stolen
goods and return them to their rightful owner' (so they can go back to the landfill skip presumably);
tried to set up a video identity parade.
I'm on bail, reporting back on Friday so that the sergeant from a police station 5 miles away can come to Wrexham,
and make me read out on tape or write on proper police forms, the signed statement I sent to the police a couple of weeks back.
I decided to make a statement to the police saying I'd taken the chairs from the skip, thinking that this would save them the
trouble of doing an identity parade, but a signed statement isn't good enough for the police,
it was apparently impossible for an officer in Wrexham police station to take a statement,
the local police station dealing with the case doesn't have tape facilities,
hence the sergeant being required to come all the way to Wrexham to do the honours.
that's what you pay taxes for. you can read about her 'adventures' on
indymedia
(update ) and the
bbc (also various other places,
email me if you want the list).
you have to admire her stance, and her conviction that she's done no wrong. respect for fighting the good fight.
i personally would have legged it long before the police got involved, leaving the chairs if necessary.
and failing that i'd have accepted the caution and had done with. actually, fuck that - "A simple caution is not a
criminal conviction, but it will be recorded on the police database. It may be used in court as evidence of bad character,
or as part of an anti-social behaviour order (ASBO) application. The record will remain on the police database along with
photographs, fingerprints and any other evidence taken". what a nightmare.
i'll post again when i get an update on the case.
29.05.2008 :
to prove that where there is will, there is always free food:
28 bananas
3 herby baguettes
2 litres milk
5 cartons of apple juice
rocket
3 cauliflowers
1 lettuce
250g cheese slices (diet cheese, not cheese at all - but shiny!)
10 onions
8 leeks
500g mince meat
400g marinated pig arse
3 lemons
400g chocolate spread
instant coffee
8 peppers (7 red, 1 green)
2 cucumbers
5 apples
1kg strawberry yoghurt
1 rye bread
11 carrots
5kg potatoes (most having seen better days)
sandwich bags
20 litres of soil
2 dish clothes
that was two hours of diving time, plus a whole lot of planning (hi-tech stuff, like studying
satellite photos, but not extending as far as comparing architectural blueprints). we visited six stores,
but due to shortfalls in our contortionist department (also a lack of lube) we only managed to
access five sets of dumpsters. two of which were completely devoid of food, whilst another two were
seriously lacking. the last dumpster, the one with the most food, was mostly just skanky.
it's a store you'd think twice of eating from, even if you took the food straight from the shelf.
but tonight we are in no position to be picky.
there was a lot we threw back too. there was half a litre of sunflower oil but it had already been
opened. same with the hot chocolate powder and the cereal. there were also some tomatoes and plums that
weren't rescueable (if that's a word).
and you may have noticed the meat . this is emil's new experiment. and i find it hard to
disagree with (incidentally, i was surprised when i heard of vegans who don't take dairy from the trash, because i've
met very few vegans who are so for dietary reasons. my bad?). he's being very selective about
the meat he takes, sensible and all that. and really, we do find a lot of meat that's only just gone out
of date and looks good. it smelt real good too, those marinated steaks. but no, it's not for me.
the strangest thing happened too. whilst we were rummaging through our most promising dumpster of the night
a car pulled up, blocking our exit. at first i thought it was just turning around, but then lights went out
and the engine stopped. it was a man and a woman, just out of view, and they started talking for a while.
i had no idea what they were saying or doing, so i suggested we go and hide (in retrospect this would have been terrible).
but then emil continues going through the dumpster again, deciding to ignore them. fair enough, because
the woman reciprocated and walked straight past us, going through the gate behind which i would have hidden.
but then the man comes up right behind me, i can feel him pushing me trying to get a look into the bin.
that's when it all went a bit weird and we decided to leave. there was something odd about his eyes, and
the way he moved his head. like he was stoned or something. he asked how much moneys worth of food we find,
500kr? we told him way less. then left as fast as was politely possible. it was a shame too, because
some of the bin bags in the dumpster were heavy .